Through Their Eyes: How Sharenting, Social Media and Screen Time Shape Children’s Identity, Brain, and Well-Being #21

Through Their Eyes: How Social Media and Screen Time Shape Children’s Identity, Brain, and Well-Being

In a world where life is increasingly lived online, children are growing up in an environment that is vastly different from any previous generation. From the moment they are born — and sometimes even before — their lives are shared across popular social media platforms. Parents post photos of their children’s milestones, while kids as young as six engage with apps and digital entertainment. What are the consequences of this early and often overwhelming digital exposure?

This essay presents a comprehensive review of recent scientific research on how social media exposure, screen time, and content creation influence children’s privacy, self-perception, brain development, and mental health. We will also explore psychological aspects of screen addiction, the rise of AI-driven threats like deepfakes, and end with evidence-based advice for parents seeking to promote a healthier developmental path for their children.

The Digital Footprint Begins Before the Child Walks

Sharenting — a portmanteau of “sharing” and “parenting” — has normalized the practice of publicly posting children’s lives online. Most parents do this innocently and with good intentions: to share joy, milestones, or funny anecdotes with loved ones. However, this seemingly harmless practice can result in long-term consequences for the child’s sense of privacy and security. Experts warn that once a photo is posted online, it’s nearly impossible to control who sees it or what’s done with it. These images can be downloaded, repurposed, or even fall into the hands of malicious individuals, including predators or cybercriminals (Otero, 2017).

What may seem like a sweet bath-time picture or a toddler’s meltdown may later become the source of humiliation, ridicule, or bullying. As children grow older, they may face teasing in school, exclusion from peer groups, or even cyberbullying due to posts they had no control over. Children have reported discomfort and embarrassment over things their parents thought were cute but that led to mockery during schoolwork presentations or classroom discussions.

Many parents are unaware of how these moments can become digital liabilities. One study found that although parents often acknowledge the risks, they continue to share content out of habit or a desire for social interaction and validation (Briazu et al., 2021).

This raises ethical questions about a child’s right to privacy. Children are often unable to consent to having their lives broadcast to wide audiences. As they grow up, many express anger or frustration that their identities were shaped online without their permission. Studies show that young adults who grew up under digital scrutiny are calling for the right to be digitally forgotten — a chance to reclaim ownership over their image and personal history (Ghafourian et al., 2024).

We Don’t Know Who’s Watching: The Real Dangers of Public Sharing

One of the most alarming aspects of posting children’s photos and personal moments online is that we truly cannot control who is seeing them. While parents may believe they are sharing innocent content with family and friends, in reality, anyone with access — including online predators — can view, download, and misuse this material.

From Cute to Criminal

What begins as a sweet image — a child at the beach, in the bathtub, or even at school — can be harvested by predators or repurposed for exploitative content. Studies show that predators actively monitor social media platforms for child images and data to use in grooming, identity theft, or even the production of child abuse material (Hong, 2024).

Once content is online, it can be:

• Screenshotted or downloaded and redistributed without consent
• Traced using metadata or geolocation to identify a child’s school, routine, or home
• Used to build psychological profiles by predators who may attempt to contact the child directly

The False Sense of Security

Many parents assume their posts are “private” because they’re shared only with friends or behind privacy settings. But privacy settings are not foolproof. Once content is uploaded, it can be:

• Reshared by others
• Accessed through friends-of-friends
• Scraped by bots or malicious actors

Even without names or direct contact info, predators can gather identifying clues from the background of photos, comments, and linked accounts to track a child’s whereabouts (Otero, 2017).

The Hunger for Likes: Children and the Economics of Validation

As children begin creating their own content, they quickly learn that online popularity is measured by likes, views, and shares. This digital economy of validation conditions them to seek external approval, shaping self-worth around public feedback. Research shows that children tailor their behavior and even personalities to fit what garners attention, often suppressing their authentic selves in the process (Zhu et al., 2024).

This feedback loop can become psychologically harmful. Children may measure their worth by how many people approve of them digitally, a practice that fosters anxiety, insecurity, and compulsive behaviors — particularly when the validation doesn’t come.

When Risk Goes Viral: Challenges and Dangerous Trends

In the race for attention online, viral “challenges” have become a cultural phenomenon. These trends often begin innocently — like dancing, lip-syncing, or showing a talent — but many spiral into dangerous territory, promoting extreme behavior, physical harm, or psychological trauma. For children and teens still developing self-regulation and critical thinking skills, these challenges can be especially hazardous.

Several documented cases show how dangerous viral trends have led children to ingest toxic substances, vandalize property, or even attempt acts of self-harm — all in the name of online fame. A 2024 study found a significant uptick in poison control center cases and hospital admissions directly linked to participation in social media challenges, especially among children under 13 (Marshall et al., 2024).

What makes these trends so powerful — and so perilous — is the psychological dynamic behind them. Children are naturally driven by a desire to belong, impress peers, and explore identity. Popular social media platforms reward participation with visibility and “likes,” acting as a digital version of peer pressure. The more extreme or sensational the behavior, the more attention it tends to receive — reinforcing the very behaviors that put children at risk.

Additionally, the speed of virality has outpaced many parents’ and educators’ ability to respond. A harmful challenge can spread globally within hours, reaching millions before any moderation or warnings can be applied. This means that children often encounter these trends in real time, before adults can intervene or even become aware of them.

Neurologically, this behavior is also linked to underdeveloped areas of the brain responsible for impulse control and risk assessment. Studies in developmental neuroscience show that the prefrontal cortex — the part of the brain responsible for decision-making — is not fully mature in children and adolescents, making them more prone to impulsive, emotionally charged actions that they may later regret.

Even more troubling is that some challenges are intentionally created by harmful online communities seeking to manipulate children into participating in risky acts. In such cases, children become unknowing targets in psychological games or coordinated campaigns.

These trends also blur the boundaries between online identity and real-life consequences. Children who perform harmful stunts for likes often don’t consider the long-term implications — disciplinary action at school, physical injuries, reputational damage, or even legal consequences.

The Silent Wounds of Hate: How Online Comments Affect Teens’ Mental Health

While social media offers spaces for expression and connection, it also opens the door to a darker reality: hateful, critical, or bullying comments. Teenagers, in particular, are vulnerable to the emotional damage caused by these interactions, which often occur in public, anonymous, and highly visible online spaces.

Studies show that hate comments and cyberbullying are strongly linked to anxiety, depression, social withdrawal, and low self-esteem in adolescents. Negative feedback posted under a teenager’s photo, video, or status can feel intensely personal — especially during critical stages of identity development (Ismail et al., 2024). These comments often center around physical appearance, popularity, cultural background, or personality traits — all highly sensitive areas for teens.

According to Social Comparison Theory, adolescents use online feedback to gauge their value compared to others. When the majority of feedback is negative or when they are targeted by hate, they may internalize these messages as truths about themselves, which erodes confidence and can distort self-perception (Nguyen et al., 2025). The more time teens spend consuming this content passively (e.g., reading comments or watching others receive hate), the greater the emotional toll.

A 2024 study exploring online hatred among adolescents found that exposure to hate leads to:

• Overthinking, irritability, and emotional isolation
• Sleep disruption, appetite changes, and mood instability
• Suicidal ideation, aggressive behavior, and self-harm tendencies
  (Septiana et al., 2024)

Teens don’t even need to be direct targets to be affected. Witnessing online hate — particularly when directed at peers or minority groups — can create a toxic digital atmosphere that fosters fear, anxiety, and disengagement. It also contributes to a culture where bullying becomes normalized, and silence becomes self-protection.

Ethnic, gender, or appearance-based hate has an even deeper psychological impact. For example, a study examining racial discrimination online showed that even resilient teens experienced elevated anxiety after repeated exposure, especially if they lacked strong self-esteem or cultural identity as buffers (Tynes et al., 2012).

What Can Be Done?

• Parents and educators should talk openly with teens about online hate and help them develop emotional resilience and media literacy.
• Platforms must improve moderation tools and provide better access to mental health resources for teens exposed to harassment.
• Encouraging teens to curate their feed, report abuse, and spend more time in positive online spaces can buffer the impact.
• Peer support and professional guidance (e.g., school counselors or digital therapy) can be instrumental in mitigating harm and rebuilding self-worth.

Mirrors and Masks: Body Image and Self-Worth

Popular social media platforms create environments where appearance is currency. Children — particularly girls — are bombarded with idealized beauty standards and influencer lifestyles. Research shows that this exposure increases body dissatisfaction, triggers eating disorders, and distorts self-worth. Boys are not immune, often internalizing pressure to appear muscular and emotionally stoic (Patil et al., 2024).

Misinformation and the Warping of Reality

In today’s digital environment, misinformation — false or misleading content — is not just common; it’s woven into the everyday fabric of online life. While adults may have the tools and life experience to question what they see, children and adolescents often do not. They absorb online content rapidly, forming impressions and beliefs that can deeply shape their understanding of the world.

This is especially dangerous because children’s brains are in a critical stage of development, particularly in areas related to reasoning, logic, and skepticism. Their cognitive filters are still maturing, and as a result, children may accept what they see or hear online as truth — whether it’s a distorted historical fact, a manipulated image, a conspiracy theory, or pseudoscientific health advice.

The problem is compounded by how popular social media platforms operate. Their algorithms are designed to prioritize content that generates engagement — not content that is true, verified, or constructive. This means emotionally charged, sensational, or polarizing content is more likely to be promoted and seen. For children, this creates a digital echo chamber that rewards reaction, not reflection.

Over time, repeated exposure to misinformation can distort a child’s perception of reality. For instance, they may believe conspiracy theories are widely accepted, misidentify what a healthy body looks like, misunderstand basic science or civic principles, or adopt extremist views under the illusion of popular support. These beliefs can influence their academic performance, social interactions, emotional health, and even political opinions later in life.

More concerning is the emotional toll of misinformation. Exposure to frightening or tragic falsehoods — such as fabricated news about health risks, violence, or disasters — can provoke anxiety, hopelessness, or hypervigilance. Children may feel overwhelmed by a world that seems dangerous, divided, or unpredictable, even if the reality around them is much more balanced.

A 2022 study highlighted that frequent exposure to digital misinformation is associated with greater levels of confusion, emotional fatigue, and conflict with parents or teachers, especially when children repeat false claims at home or in school (Hellman, 2022). These situations often lead to arguments, loss of trust, or the entrenchment of views based on misinformed content.

Additionally, misinformation can foster unrealistic expectations about life — what success looks like, how relationships function, how money is made, or what it takes to be “popular.” Many children begin modeling their own behavior after influencers or fabricated personas without understanding that what they see may be heavily edited, scripted, or outright false. This contributes to feelings of inadequacy, envy, and pressure to perform, which are closely linked to depression and anxiety in adolescents.

The most dangerous effect of all may be desensitization. When children are repeatedly exposed to extreme, false, or harmful content without meaningful guidance, they may become emotionally numb or disengaged. They stop asking whether something is true and start accepting the internet as a reflection of reality — no matter how warped that reality may be.

This is why media literacy is now considered an essential part of childhood education. Teaching children to verify sources, check for bias, recognize manipulation tactics, and think critically about online content is no longer optional — it’s a form of psychological and civic self-defense.

We Don’t Know Who’s Watching: The Hidden Dangers Behind Every Post

One of the most disturbing aspects of posting children online — whether it’s done by children themselves or by well-meaning parents — is that we truly have no idea who is watching. In the digital age, the audience is never just our friends and family. Posts can be screenshotted, downloaded, and reshared without consent, and images can circulate far beyond the original platform. This creates serious and often underestimated risks for children’s privacy and safety.

Sharenting and the False Sense of Safety

Most parents who post about their children online do so out of love. They want to celebrate milestones, share funny moments, or express pride. This practice, known as sharenting, is now a norm of modern parenting. However, studies show that parents frequently post sensitive information without understanding the permanent and public nature of digital content, or the risks that this exposure carries (Marasli et al., 2016).

Many parents also believe that by keeping their profiles “private,” their content is secure. But privacy settings are not foolproof. Friends of friends may still see posts, and once an image is online, it can be copied and redistributed infinitely, with no way to trace where it goes. Predators and identity thieves actively scan social media sites looking for accessible images and personal data of minors, often using seemingly innocent content for malicious purposes (Amon et al., 2022).

Digital Breadcrumbs and Online Profiling

Even when a post appears harmless, it may contain metadata and contextual clues that can be used to profile a child. For example, a back-to-school photo might show the child’s name tag, school uniform, classroom number, or even GPS data if location tagging is enabled. Posts that include nicknames, birthdates, sports team names, or the inside of your home can also serve as puzzle pieces to construct a comprehensive digital identity.

According to researchers, these digital breadcrumbs make it possible for online predators to track children’s routines, environments, and vulnerabilities. In the wrong hands, this data can be exploited for cyberstalking, grooming, or even physical threats (Otero, 2017). The risk increases as AI tools become more advanced, allowing predators to mimic a child’s voice, face, or online behavior using just a few samples of uploaded content to

The Emotional and Developmental Cost

Beyond safety threats, children suffer long-term emotional consequences from being overexposed online. As they grow older, many become aware — often for the first time — of the thousands of photos, stories, and videos that their parents have posted about them without consent. Some experience embarrassment, shame, or resentment, particularly when those posts include private or awkward moments. These posts can become ammunition for bullying at school or create anxiety about being judged or ridiculed (Ghafourian et al., 2024).

Furthermore, this lack of agency over their digital presence may interfere with their emerging sense of autonomy, trust in caregivers, or ability to shape their identity on their own terms. When a child’s life is documented online before they even understand what the internet is, they are denied the basic right to choose how they want to present themselves to the world.

Digital Breadcrumbs, Deepfakes, and Danger: How AI Empowers Predators

According to researchers, the digital breadcrumbs left behind by social media posts — such as photos, videos, metadata, and context clues — make it possible for online predators to track children’s routines, environments, and vulnerabilities (Otero, 2017). But as artificial intelligence tools grow more advanced, the risks are no longer just about visibility — they’re about digital manipulation.

Predators can now use AI-powered tools like deepfake generators and voice cloning software to exploit even a small number of public posts. A high-resolution image of a child, or a short video with their voice, can be enough to train AI to generate synthetic pornographic content, mimic a child in scam phone calls, or impersonate them online to deceive others — including friends, family, or school staff (Algamar & Ampri, 2022).

These AI-generated manipulations can lead to:

• Emotional trauma from discovering one’s identity was misused
• Social manipulation or extortion
• Creation of non-consensual synthetic abuse material, especially involving children of online influencers

AI also enables predators to mimic child voices or faces convincingly, allowing them to trick others into providing more personal information, or even to breach schools or online platforms pretending to be the child — amplifying grooming and exploitation risks beyond what human predators could do alone (Jasserand, 2024).

This technological shift means even innocent posts can be weaponized, turning harmless family moments into tools for exploitation. The solution, experts argue, lies in limiting exposure, educating families, and implementing stronger digital rights and protections for children — including the ability to delete or de-list digital content (“the right to be forgotten”) [(Algamar & Ampri, 2022)].

What Can Parents Do to Protect Their Children?

1. Think before you post – Ask yourself: Would this embarrass my child in the future? Would I be okay if a stranger saw this?
2. Avoid sharing identifying details – Never include full names, school names, addresses, birthdays, or locations.
3. Disable geotags and metadata – Turn off location tagging and remove embedded data from images before uploading.
4. Limit who can see your posts – Use encrypted private messaging apps to share photos with family instead of public platforms.
5. Ask for your child’s input – As soon as your child is old enough to understand, let them decide what photos or stories they’re okay with sharing.
6. Review and clean your digital history – Periodically go through past posts and delete outdated or overly personal content.

The Neurological Cost: What Screen Time Does to the Developing Brain

Neurologically, high screen exposure — especially during key stages of brain development — can alter cognitive function. Researchers have identified links between excessive screen time and changes in the brain’s reward systems, attention regulation, and emotional control (Sharma, 2018), (Marciano et al., 2021).

A 2024 study found that children exposed to screens for more than two hours per day showed higher rates of inattention, emotional volatility, and impaired sensory processing (Tekeci et al., 2024).

The Psychology of Screen Addiction

In recent years, health professionals have begun to recognize screen addiction — sometimes referred to as Screen Dependency Disorder (SDD) — as a genuine psychological and behavioral issue affecting both children and adolescents. This condition goes beyond occasional overuse. It involves compulsive, excessive, and emotionally dysregulated use of digital devices, which interferes with a child’s everyday functioning, development, and relationships.

What distinguishes screen addiction from casual screen use is the loss of control. Children with screen dependency struggle to stop using devices even when it causes conflict, interferes with sleep, schoolwork, or physical activity, or when they experience distress in other areas of life. This behavioral pattern closely mirrors what clinicians observe in substance abuse — including tolerance (needing more time on screens to feel satisfied) and withdrawal symptoms such as irritability, anxiety, or aggression when access is limited or denied.

How Screens Hook the Brain

Digital content — especially games, social media, and video platforms — is engineered to activate the dopamine system, the same neural pathway involved in reward-seeking and pleasure. Each notification, “like,” or level-up delivers a small dopamine hit, which teaches the brain to associate screens with pleasure and safety. Over time, the brain craves more stimulation, and the child begins to seek the screen not just for entertainment, but as a way to escape boredom, loneliness, or negative emotions (Sharma, 2018).

This rewiring of the brain’s reward center can dull sensitivity to everyday activities. Things like reading a book, playing outside, or having a conversation may no longer feel rewarding — because they lack the intensity of digital feedback. This is why addicted children often say they’re “bored” when not on a device and may show little interest in non-screen hobbies.

Emotional and Social Consequences

Psychologists have observed that screen addiction is often linked to emotional dysregulation. Children addicted to screens may have a harder time managing anger, disappointment, or frustration. They might throw tantrums when asked to stop using a device or spiral emotionally when their online experience is disrupted. This is especially problematic during early childhood, when emotional regulation skills are still developing.

Socially, excessive screen time has been linked to delays in communication, empathy, and problem-solving skills. Children who rely on digital interactions may struggle with face-to-face conversations, reading body language, or understanding social nuances. A study in 2018 found that some children with screen addiction showed regressed behaviors that mimicked symptoms of autism spectrum disorder — including lack of eye contact, speech delays, and poor impulse control — which in some cases improved after reducing screen exposure (Shafqat, 2018).

Academic Impairment and Sleep Disruption

Excessive screen use — particularly late at night — has also been associated with poor academic performance. It impairs concentration, reduces the quality of homework, and is linked to increased procrastination. Children who use screens into the evening often experience sleep disturbances, including trouble falling asleep, poor-quality sleep, and reduced REM cycles. Blue light from screens disrupts melatonin production, making it harder for the brain to transition into rest mode (Marciano et al., 2021).

Sleep loss, in turn, affects memory consolidation, emotional stability, and attention the following day — creating a feedback loop of fatigue and digital reliance.

Underlying Emotional Triggers

Psychologists also note that screen addiction in children is often a coping mechanism for deeper issues: anxiety, stress, loneliness, or family tension. In homes where communication is limited or where parents are also heavily reliant on screens, children may mirror this behavior and retreat into digital worlds. Over time, they may lose the capacity to sit with uncomfortable feelings or resolve emotional distress without digital distraction.

Left unaddressed, screen addiction can contribute to long-term issues, including increased risk of depression, social withdrawal, low self-esteem, and even digital dissociation — a sense of detachment from one’s own life or identity.

Healthier Alternatives: What Science Recommends

The antidote to overexposure is not just screen reduction — it’s screen replacement. Activities such as outdoor play, reading, imaginative storytelling, sports, and hands-on learning offer cognitive, emotional, and physical benefits that digital content cannot match (Song, 2024).

Practical Tips for Parents: What You Can Do Today

As daunting as the digital world may seem, there are realistic, science-based steps that parents can take to protect their children — not by banning technology altogether, but by guiding its use with structure, intention, and empathy. Below are expanded strategies that work across ages, with notes for both young children and teenagers:

1. Create Tech-Free Zones and Routines

Why it matters: Screen boundaries help children and teens reconnect with their environment, family, and themselves.

• For young children: Designate places like the dinner table, bedrooms, and car rides as screen-free zones. This promotes family bonding, encourages conversation, and reinforces routines such as bedtime reading or play.
• For teens: Encourage screen-free routines in the morning and evening. Let them wake up and wind down without checking their phones. Make the bedroom a sanctuary for sleep, not scrolling.

Tip: Use baskets or drawers where devices go during “off” hours. Having a visible, shared charging station keeps everyone accountable.

2. Replace, Don’t Just Restrict

Why it matters: Telling a child to “get off the screen” without offering an engaging alternative often results in resistance or boredom.

• For young children: Offer fun alternatives like coloring books, puzzles, LEGO sets, gardening, or sensory play (like kinetic sand or water tables). Rotate toys regularly to keep them fresh.
• For teens: Suggest creative outlets like journaling, music, photography, volunteering, cooking, or sports. Encourage them to explore interests that spark intrinsic motivation, not likes.

Tip: Create a family “discovery box” — a bin of rotating books, activities, or crafts that are always available when screens are off.

3. Talk Openly About Online Content

Why it matters: Children and teens need adult guidance to decode what they see online.

• For young children: Ask what videos they’re watching. Use shows or games as conversation starters to explore emotions, choices, and reality vs. fantasy.
• For teens: Discuss viral trends, influencer culture, or news stories. Ask open-ended questions like, “What do your friends think about this?” or “How do you know this is true?” This builds critical thinking and media literacy.

Tip: Watch occasional content together and model healthy skepticism. “That’s interesting — I wonder if it’s true. How can we check?”

4. Be a Role Model

Why it matters: Children mirror what they see — especially from their parents.

• For young children: Show joy in reading a book, cooking, or being outdoors. Narrate your actions: “I’m putting my phone away so we can talk.”
• For teens: Acknowledge your own struggles with screen time. When teens see you consciously choosing to unplug, they’re more likely to consider doing the same.

Tip: Implement “digital sabbath” times where everyone — including parents — puts away their phones for a set period.

5. Give Them Control

Why it matters: Involving children and teens in the process makes them more likely to accept limits and feel empowered.

• For young children: Offer simple choices: “Would you like 30 minutes of a show now or after your snack?”
• For teens: Let them co-create a screen time plan that includes flexibility and responsibility. Encourage them to set app limits or suggest weekly screen-free family activities.

Tip: Use a reward system — screen time is earned after other tasks (homework, chores, reading) are completed. This reinforces balance.

6. Ease the Transition

Why it matters: Abrupt removal of screens can cause meltdowns or rebellion, especially if the child is already dependent.

• For young children: Use timers and verbal warnings (“5 minutes left”) to prepare them for the end of screen time. Create visual schedules showing what comes next.
• For teens: Use digital wellness apps to track time and set usage goals. Introduce incremental reductions instead of full bans. Encourage them to journal how they feel after offline activities.

Tip: Pair screen transitions with something pleasurable — like snack time, a walk, or music — so the shift feels rewarding, not like punishment.

7. Teach Digital Permanence

Why it matters: Many children don’t understand that what they post or share — and what others post about them — may last forever.

• For young children: Explain that once something is online, it can be seen by people we don’t know. Use age-appropriate books or videos about online safety.
• For teens: Discuss real-world consequences of oversharing — from college admissions to job opportunities. Help them do a “digital cleanup” of their social media profiles and talk about managing their digital footprint.

Tip: Practice the “pause before you post” rule. Encourage them to ask, “Would I want my teacher, grandparent, or future self to see this?”

Final Thought for Parents

The goal isn’t to eliminate screens — it’s to raise children who are mindful, balanced, and in control of their digital lives. With your support, structure, and conversation, children can grow up as responsible users of technology rather than passive consumers. And as a parent, pause and reflect deeply — not once, but a thousand times — before sharing images of your child online, because once posted, control is no longer yours.”

References

• Algamar, M. D., & Ampri, A. I. I. (2022). Hak Untuk Dilupakan: Penghapusan Jejak Digital Sebagai Perlindungan Selebriti Anak dari Bahaya Deepfake. JURNAL YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN.

• Amon, S., Kartvelishvili, N., & Cino, D. (2022). Sharenting and children’s privacy in the United States: A legal and ethical analysis of digital parenting. Journal of Law and Technology, 48(2), 112–128.
• Briazu, R. A., Floccia, C., & Hanoch, Y. (2021). Facebook sharenting in mothers of young children: The risks, benefits, and their associations with parental mental health. Current Psychology, 40, 2499–2509.
• Ghafourian, T., Micallef, N., & Patil, S. (2024). From the childhood past: Views of young adults on parental sharenting practices and their calls for digital rights. Journal of Child Media Studies, 7(1), 32–49.
• Hellman, A. (2022). Digital screens and children: How misinformation and media exposure shape child perception and well-being. Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 823–839.
• Iskül, A.-M., & Joamets, K. (2021). Child right to privacy and social media – Personal information oversharing parents. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 14, 101–122.

• Ismail, N. A., Mukramin, S. N., & Shahbudin, R. (2024). The impact of hate comments on social media users: A Malaysian perspective. Journal of Cyber Psychology, 13(1), 55–70.
• Jasserand, C. (2024). Deceptive Deepfakes: Is the Law Coping with AI-Altered Representations of Ourselves? Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG).
• Marciano, L., & Camerini, A. L. (2021). The developing brain in the digital era: A scoping review of neuroscience literature on screen media use in children and adolescents. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 125, 691–706.
• Marasli, M., Suhendan, E., Dilmac, B., & Arslan, C. (2016). Parents’ shares on social networking sites about their children: Sharenting. The Anthropologist, 24(2), 399–406.
• Marshall, R. D., Bailey, L. C., & Others. (2024). Impact of social media “challenges” on poison center case volume and health risks in children. Journal of Pediatric Toxicology, 12(1), 15–28.
• Nguyen, T., Trương, M., & Hương, N. T. (2025). Can online behaviors be linked to mental health? Active and passive digital engagement among adolescents. Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 29(1), 90–108.
• Otero, P. (2017). Sharenting… should children’s lives be disclosed on social media? Archivos argentinos de pediatría, 115(5), 412–413

• Otero, P. (2017). Sharenting… should children’s lives be disclosed on social media? International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 3(2), 555–564.
• Patil, A. A., Salimath, G. B., & Angolkar, M. (2024). Impact of social media influence on eating behavior in mid-adolescent students: A gender-based analysis. Journal of Adolescent Health and Nutrition, 9(1), 41–51.
• Septiana, M., Muslihati, M., & Fitria, H. (2024). Understanding the dynamics of online hatred and mental health impacts on adolescents. Journal of Youth Psychology, 16(1), 29–44.
• Shafqat, M. (2018). Screen addiction among young Pakistani children: Behavioral patterns and cognitive delay. Pakistan Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(1), 55–67.
• Sharma, V. P. (2018). Screen Dependency Disorders (SDD): An innovative contest for clinical psychiatry in children. Indian Journal of Psychiatry and Neurology, 29(3), 178–184.
• Song, M. (2024). Assessing the impact of social media exposure on children’s cognition and social development. Child Psychology and Human Development, 55(2), 200–219.
• Tekeci, S. Y., Torpil, B., & Others. (2024). The impact of screen exposure on screen addiction and sensory processing in preschool children. International Journal of Early Childhood Education Research, 18(2), 112–128.
• Tynes, B. M., Umaña‐Taylor, A. J., Rose, C. A., Lin, J., & Anderson, C. J. (2012). Online racial discrimination and the protective function of ethnic identity and self-esteem for African American adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 343–355.
• Zhu, J., Jiang, L., Dou, W., Wang, V. L., & Zhou, L. (2024). Beyond the “like” button: Ideal social self-congruity, adolescents’ digital behavior, and the need for validation. Journal of Youth and Media Psychology, 15(2), 102–119.